See Ya On Route 66
As I expected, it has finally happened. The SoFlo police state minions have taken notice of me and my Mini. ( How many times will I have to attend Stand-up Comedy Driving School during my short but eventful life? ) What I did not expect, however, was the embarrassing way in which it happened. I was doing my routine Plantation-to-Fort-Loud run, headed for Two Street Garage, and I innocently cruised past a certain place, when a police cruiser came after me. I’ve done this run a hundred times. I like its straight-but-littered-with-obstacles ( cars ) quality. But will you believe me I never noticed that, right before Avenue of the Arts, where I start getting ready for that final right-hand turn right before the railroad tracks, is the fucking Fort Lauderdale Police Headquarters? Well it is. As Officer Diaz generously pointed out for me the other day.
Officer Diaz: “Where are you going, sir?”
Héctor: “To the Two Street Garage on Moffat Avenue.”
Officer Diaz: “Are you in a hurry?”
Héctor: “Oh no, no...”
Officer Diaz: “These Minis are nice cars, ah?”
Héctor: “Oh yes, they’re great, but this is not an S, it’s just the plain vanilla Mini.” ( That was my pathetic attempt at inspiring pity. But no. Apparently, doing a mere 53mph over the 40mph speed limit in front of police headquarters, for some mysterious reason kept secret from us mere civilian citizens, disqualifies you from getting any pity points. It’s so unfair! )
Officer Diaz: “They go pretty fast, these Minis.”
Héctor: “Well...” ( How the fuck was I supposed to answer that? )
Officer Diaz: “I’ve never issued a citation in front of headquarters. You know you just passed police headquarters, huh?”
Héctor: “Yeah, I bet you haven’t...” ( Am I crazy, I should not have said that! ) “...no, I didn’t know officer...”
Officer Diaz: “You must have been going what, 80...?”
Héctor: “I’m not sure...” ( It was 93mph, actually. But, I swear, the road was wide open in front of me for a good 2 or 3 miles. )
Officer Diaz: “May-I-see-your-driver’s-license-and-car-registration-please?”
I am very lucky, really I am, because Officer Diaz had a sense of humor and was actually enjoying the comedic irony of the situation. He was smart enough to know nobody would be stupid enough to knowingly do such a thing. So I was not hauled to the slammer for sheer audacity. But humor and all, I now have my first SoFlo speeding ticket. And I am, once more, headed for Stand-up Comedy Driving School. This happened a couple of days ago. Coming back home that afternoon, I made a scientific experiment. I drove from Fort Loud to my place in Plantation at the speed limit: 45mph. And you know what? Not only was it a dark, mind-boggling and terrifying experience ( it felt like neither I nor anybody else were moving at all, as if we were all in permanent pavement limbo ) but I also nearly got involved in two ( yes, that’s right, 2 ) traffic accidents! Neither of which would have been my fault. So I am thus compelled to expound my Theory of Speed and Safety ( ToSaS ) for your edification and the benefit of mankind. I have revealed this theory to some of you before, but only informally, while chatting about this and that. This is the first time I put it down in writing. So bear with me and my so-so writing skills.
Three Myths About Speed and Safety
1. IT IS PEOPLE DRIVING TOO FAST WHO CAUSE ACCIDENTS. Not true. That is only a simplistic assessment of circumstances. Actually, it is people in a hurry or distracted who cause most accidents, especially the spectacular ones. Speed only increases the amount of energy the car in question possesses when it impacts something else, not the likelihood of impact. The confusion arises because people in a hurry or distracted are naturally prone to drive faster than is lawful, and are also prone to get involved in or cause accidents; observers identify speed as the cause of calamity only because speed is easier to spot than carelessness. There is no doubt about the fact that the person was going fast, but can one prove he or she were being careless, much less in a hurry? Not easily. So speed takes the blame.
2. SPEED KILLS. Not true. That is mere demagogy and rank sentimentalist propaganda. It’s a very good and effective slogan, but if we are going to be strict and scientific at all, it is actually metal, glass, plastic, trees and pavement that kill. ( Occasionally, human flesh other than yours may also kill you, especially bones. )
3. SPORTS CARS ARE DANGEROUS. Not true. ( Sort of. ) Again, this is a matter of superficially perceived circumstances and taxonomical recklessness. The bad reputation of performance cars comes from the fact that, like guns, sports cars are available to any moron who can pay the purchase price. The same driver’s license that empowers you to chug along in your Saturn absurdly also allows you to drive a 12-cylinder, 571 horsepower Lamborghini Murcielago capable of 205.1mph. Still: even after adjusting for vastly different numbers and the fragility of these cars, many more people die in or are killed by Honda Civics than by Ferraris et al. Do your own un-scientific poll: How many times during a normal driving day do you scream “Asshole!” at someone driving a sports car versus someone driving a minivan, SUV, econobox or jalopy? Be honest. Rarely. A sports car is no signifier of high speed or low intelligence. In fact, it is a common occurrence here in SoFlo to be trapped behind some imbecile creating a hazardous public nuisance by driving a brand-new Porsche Carrera at 25mph in a 45mph zone. And I am not talking about elderly drivers.
The Sociological Truth
I am not in a hurry. I do not care to get there, where-ever there is, any sooner. I do not race. I do not care if someone goes faster or gets ahead of me. If I pass an exit it is not irksome to continue and turn back at the next exit. I drive fast, when possible, because I enjoy: A. Driving, and, B. Driving at high speed.
However and unfortunately, most people who drive fast, drive too fast because: A. They are in a hurry for some reason, good or bad. B. They are impatient for no reason at all other than a clinically small attention-span and low self-esteem. C. They correlate speed with the size of their penis or the sensitivity of their clitoris, and cannot help but to announce it to the world with the sound of their engines and the screech of their tires. D. They wrongly believe themselves to be automobile enthusiasts* and, in addition to all the absurd additions they put on their often absurdly inadequate cars, they think it is sporting to go fast. ( Many, many, oh so many NASCAR fans are in this category, often in all four. ) I will henceforth refer to all these drivers as Dangerous Hot-Wheels Speeders ( DHWS ) or DHWSers.
( *True automobile enthusiasts would NEVER... [A] Stick supposedly “performance-enhancing” crap onto their cars, and especially so if they are ( may God help them find a better job soon ) driving Escorts, Civics, Hyundais and the like. ( It is like a skinny-scrawny guy wearing dude-leather. Hellooo-oo? It only underlines the econoboxiness of your car and your sub-normal intelligence. It is a neon sign that says: “Look everybody, looksee, I’m driving a piece-of-shit car but just spent two grand adding a completely non-functional, possibly detrimental-to-performance and certainly fuck-ugly wing onto its fuck-ugly trunk.” ) [B] Equate their speed with their sexual wherewithal ( which if you think about it, makes no sense at all! ) [C] Drive fast when they should not. [D] Let their emotions rule their driving. [E] Drink and drive. [F] Tailgate. [G] Fuck around with radios, CDs, cellphones, cameras, giant slushies, Big Macs, maps, directions, lipstick, girlfriends, blondes, girls, coffee mugs, cigarettes or anything else while driving fast. [H] Think about things other than the road, the car, the other cars, the area, the pedestrians and the unexpected while driving fast. [I] Trust other drivers to ever behave in a sane, logical, gentlemanly or predictable manner. [J] Drive fast in an unknown or unfamiliar area, unless it’s the middle of the open Wyoming prairie, and even then, with their hearts in their hand. [K] Blindly trust their knowledge of a particular area. [L] Go anywhere near the cruise control. [M] Ignore school zones or construction areas. [N] Get cocky about their own skills. [O] Get cocky about their car’s capabilities. [P] Play music louder or as loud as the road noise while driving fast. ( Better to play no music at all. ) [Q.] Wear headphones, especially noise-canceling headphones. [R] Play loose with the laws of physics. [S] Rely blindly on their knowledge of the laws of physics. [T] Depend on their car’s avowed weight-to-power ratio. [U] Yell, cut off or otherwise lose their patience with other drivers. [V] Test “to the edge” their car’s limitations unless in a closed circuit. [W] Treat rural areas as “duty-free zones.” [X] Ignore weather conditions. [Y] Behave unkindly to drivers, motorcyclists, animals, greenery or pedestrians. [Z] Fuck around with trucks and truckers. )
The disgusting practice of tailgating illustrates quite well of how little real consequence speed is to DHWSers. As any self-respecting lover of driving knows, being 6 inches away from the car in front of you does NOT increase your speed by a single mile-per-hour or decrease your time-of-arrival by a second. Still, you see DHWSers do this all the time. They not only believe they are going faster by tailgating but also that they are getting there sooner because they are a few car-lengths farther down the road. Obviously, these poor misguided people have had no contact with Einstein’s theories of relativity, or even simple Euclidean geometry. Tailgating is quite simply rude, unsportsmanlike, unelegant, reckless and immoral. You can only tailgate when you are driving in a racing circuit and even there quite strict written and unwritten rules of etiquette apply. Those who do otherwise are just saying to the world, and sadly, quite correctly: “I’m a bloody fucking dumbass.”

At this point you may be wondering why then was I so distracted those prior 99 times when I passed in front of Fort Lauderdale’s Police Headquarters that I failed to notice its being there. ( It is quite a large building and rather brightly colored, it’s parking lot dotted with, what else, police cruisers, though they do not really operate from there, as Officer Diaz explained. ) Well, all I can say is that I live here in stifling hot, humid, sprawly, dollar-store god-forsaken SoFlo, a mere 23 miles from the western vertex of the Bermuda Triangle at Odd Coconut Point in Miami Beach ( the other two being in Bermuda and San Juan, Puerto Rico ) and very strange things start happening to your brain if you stay here longer than 48 hours. I can assure you, though, that automotive speed played no part in that little drama of ignorance.
So, to put down my point, high speed is not the cause of DHWSers’ dangerousness. High speed is only a characteristic of their unsafe driving though, of course, an unwelcome and exacerbating one. If DHWSers drove slower, they would still cause or be involved in the same number of accidents, ( or more, as you will see later, ) only these would be less severe. And that, I can’t deny, would be better for everybody.
The Ontological Truth
Now lets turn to the philosophical nitty-gritty: to the somewhat hard to grasp but nevertheless true fact that driving fast is SAFER than not. Please answer these simple questions truthfully: A. “Where do ALL accidents in which you may be involved happen, without exception?” B. “If you are involved in an accident, who are you going to be involved in that accident with?” C. “What can you do about the previous two facts?” D. “How can you do that and still use an automobile for transportation?”
The simple answers are that...
A: All accidents in which you may be involved happen, without the least exception, where-you-are-now.
B: You will be involved in an accident ONLY with those occupying a space-time slot near you, i.e., where-you-are-now.
C: The only thing you can do about the previous two facts is to get out of where-you-are-now as soon as possible.
D: And your only recourse to do so is to step on the gas pedal and increase your speed.
You may ask the question: “But would one not also get sooner to where-one-will-be-then by getting faster out of where-one-is-now? And have an accident there and then instead?” A valid question, indeed. Unfortunately, there is NOTHING, absolutely, you can do about getting to where you are going to be then. Nothing. Slow or fast, or not moving at all, you’ll get there when you do; never before, never after, never not. The fact is that you cannot not get there. So this question is philosophically interesting but irrelevant to the issue of safety. The only thing that is in your power to decide ( depending on road conditions, the-other-cars-circumstances and your own car’s weight-to-power ratio ) is how long are you going to dilly-dally where-you-are-now. You may choose to cruise about... or you may decide to get the fuck out of there! And fast! Pronto Tonto!
Consider these facts...
A. The longer you are on the road, the higher are your chances of being in a traffic accident of some kind. When I did my experimental speed-limit-run from Fort Loud to Plantation, it took me more than twice as long to get from the one to the other. It is no surprise then that I was almost involved in a couple of accidents. All other things being equal, there are less chances of collision during a 15-minute span of time than there are during a 45-minute drive. This is simple and unassailable logic.
B. Notice that when you are driving at or around the speed limit, you are constantly surrounded by other cars. It is quite like birds migrating, flying in formation. Obviously, the higher the density of cars where-you-are-now is, the higher the chance to be involved in an accident with one of those cars becomes. More simple and unassailable logic.
C. Notice then that when you are driving fast, you move from one area of high car density to an empty stretch of road and into another high density area and then to another solitary stretch of road, and so on. Driving fast means that you may spend 50% of your time or more ( depending on traffic conditions ) driving by yourself. And while you inhabit these stretches of solitude, there are ( “Bingo!” ) no other cars to have an accident with. ( Here I must state that in the interest of clarity and simplicity, I am putting aside possible collisions with inanimate and unguided objects such as trees, buildings, bridges, bus shelters, mail boxes, vending machines, parked cars, etcetera. ) These areas of lowest-car-density are only created-by and available-when your speed is considerably higher than that of other drivers in your vicinity. One last morsel of simple and unassailable logic. ( Study the sesame-street-simple diagram below. )

A friend and fellow seeker of Truth once commented: “But do you realize, Oh Wise Beyond Your Wits Master Héctor, that if everyone lived by ToSaS, then ToSaS would not work and would not be true anymore?” Yes, that is quite true. However, it is statistically unlikely if not outright impossible but certainly improbable that even a minuscule percentage of drivers will ever know, understand or apply the precepts of ToSaS. Or do so correctly. So it remains, as always, to the few enlightened ones to say “Ooommmhhh” as we firmly grip the steering wheel, lightly hold the stick shift knob, boldly step on the gas pedal... and get the fuck out of where-we-are-now!
A quote...
<< And in the lowest depth,
>> A lower depth. >>
>> John Milton
>> Paradise Lost, 1667


why is that supposed to be a good thing? ) One could posit that zebras do not believe themselves capable of inventing firearms and using them to exterminate their lions, cheetahs and other nightmares, ( after which, of course, they would turn the weapons on themselves. ) Their lack of belief in the "zebra-impossible" results in their still being part of a balanced diet for the big cats. ( Opposable thumbs would also help. ) After countless millennia of dogged struggle, we have "progressed" beyond that ( and, golly, look at the results! ) But can one possibly doubt that incredible good luck has played a vital role in our history...? One can't. The only trouble with luck as a survival strategy is that it is not repeatable. ( There is a lovely scene in Tom Stoppard's << Rosencrantz & Guilderstern Are Dead >> about this unfortunate ( ha ) fact. ) BUT WE DON'T REALLY BELIEVE THAT. If we did, gambling would not be a growth industry and Hollywood would be a ghost town. You'd never catch glimpse of an überdork in a meaty bar. There would be mass suicides, everything would come to an inglorious end. Not only do we believe luck is repeatable, we also believe it is imminent, even after years of evidence to the contrary. Without this moron-instinct of ours our
overgrown brains would have killed us long ago. We'd be too intelligent to live. Misplaced trust is as much a part of our adaptive skills as is suspicion. While the meal-ticket is an obvious ecological arrangement, the legendary free-lunch is proof positive of the existence of our moron-instinct. But lets elevate our conversation and consider why free is better than deserved. It is quite simple. Deserved is a product of our own hands and therefore inextricably bound to the earth we came from and will return to. No matter what we achieve. On the other hand, free is a freak of nature, a violation of the rules, a momentary lapse of circumstantial cruelty, a virgin birth, a statistical reality that is utterly fantastic, a blip, a bloop, a bonus, a complete but effortless triumph, against impossible odds, against the entire universe. Good fortune is a revolt against fate that for once works out to our benefit. The feeling of skepticism is overwhelmed by boundless gratitude. ( The question is... to whom? ) That is why obtaining something material ( or immaterial ) completely free produces such incomparable pleasure. You "just cannot believe" what you are forced to believe by the unlikely circumstances. The pleasure is as strong as our pain ( and disbelief ) when confronting bad luck. Inseparable from the moron-instinct, however, is our yeah-right-instinct. These are the incredibly versatile pair of evolutionary quirks that motors our will. While my moron-instinct keeps me from ever completely giving up the hope for impossible things such as Uma Thurman, Marisa Tomei and Lauren Bacall knocking down my door one night as the trinity of lust and sneaking into my bed, my yeah-right-instinct keeps me from seriously loosing sleep expecting Uma Thurman, Marisa Tomei and Lauren Bacall to come knocking at my door one night as the trinity of lust. This opposition produces the "cor inquietum" Saint Augustine wrote about, the unbalanced
heart that is always in motion, tending to something better than what is. It manufactures both fools and geniuses. When in balance, we are content-but-in-motion. When not, we are miserable or disastrously reckless. We exhibit the extremes of the two. I have never played the Lottery because I am absolutely certain that I will not win, which destroys the fun, yet keep up with all the latest information about Lamborghini as if I expected to buy one next month. And I know that la mystérieuse will walk through the door one day and look at me with love in her eyes. Finally lets get a bit profane with the propane: is the moron-instinct the origin of religion? Is faith nothing more than our moron-instinct gone awry? Are depression and despair the result of the yeah-right-instinct gone berserk? Honestly, I do not have the slightest notion of an answer but —though an absolute materialist— every so often find myself in a luscious state of grace.

And who can we blame? Time, God, communists, ethnicos, ETs, our parents, siblings, lack of the same, gym teachers, the cosmetic-counter help...? They ( it is always "They" because ultimate evil is always the work of Them, the other tribes, who are Not Like Us ) dinged my Mini on the passenger side, somehow behind the door, so I do not have to confront the horror too often. I simply don't open the door for ladies anymore. ( Just kidding, my mother would kill me. ) I think it does not bother me but have mysteriously started parking the Mini always in a spot where the driver's side ( still untouched ) is next to the curb, not to another car, no matter how far I have to walk from and to my car. The reason I get by is because I still have something in its primordial state, un-fallen from grace, un-godded, un-snaked, un-appleled, so shiny and new. I just cannot, will not tell you what it is. Go get your own.
She is a graphic slash interaction designer. She listens to heavy metal "music." She was raised in Madison, WI but you would not think so if you met her. ( Not that there is anything wrong with Madison or WI, but still. ) She is also exiled here in SoFlo. In fact, it is Her Fault that I find myself here as well. I am actually grateful, though, since this captivity was the right thing at the right time even if not in the right place. You can visit her website by clicking on her name in the "Meet" section ( no double-entendre intended ) to the right and way down the scrollbar. She refuses to believe that she looks like Kate Winslet. In fact, in << Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, >> Kate Winslet is practically doing an impression of Jenny. It was uncanny to watch. Many people wonder why she tossed my cellphone into the Middle River, just-almost-where-it-hits-the-sea in Ft. Lauderdale. Here is what happened, without embellishments, as I've explained to quite a few concerned friends...
and exciting get-rich-quick schemes is producing a prime-time talk show, ( it would be the first one, I believe, ) called << The Jenny Levin Show. >> We would sell it to Fox, of course, for a bucket of gold and "total creative control." I would be the invisible producer and she would be the celebrity-du-jour. I cannot tell you more about our amazingly original and never-before-attempted format for the show because, yes, it is a secret. However, do watch the airwaves, and scan the channel seas, to tune to the tube, because TJLS is coming soon to a fully-digital, web-enabled, idiotising-device near you.
That is Juanito Perez, sitting on the floral sofa in the living room of my small Ft. Lauderdale apartment. In the candid photo shown here he turned around just in time for me to snap the boyish face. We were inseparable friends during our very early childhood but eventually drifted apart and lost track of each other. Then last Wednesday, while ransacking the prepared foods section, I ran into him at the WholeFoods™ on Highway 1, just north of Victoria Park. What an unexpected surprise. I recognized him immediately but he had some difficulty recalling who I was. It hurt my feelings but I cannot blame him for it. Still, I was angry. It felt like an undeserved slap in the face. And how could I fail to recognize my friend Juanito? He looks EXACTLY as he did back in 1963-64. I mean, the little bastard has not grown an inch, put on an ounce, nor aged a day! There is nothing more annoying than eternal youth, especially when it happens to someone else. Luckily I have acquired a thick carapace of good manners and some wisdom since those years and was suavely able to greet him warmly ( after explaining who the fuck I was, that is ) and invite him to have a drink at Mona's on Sunrise Boulevard.
I thought getting him into Mona's was going to prove difficult, what with his looking five-years-old and all, but he somehow was able to charm everyone just the second before they actually saw him and we were sitting at the bar before my eyes could adjust to the red darkness. He ordered a milkshake and was given a white russian without being asked for an ID or anything. Couldn't they see, he is just a child? I ordered a Macallan and Vigo ( the bartender ) looked at me as if I had spoken in some ghastly bad imitation of his native Estonian dialect. "Yoowantawhatt...?" Snarl. Blink. "Just get me a Bud...?" cleared the atmosphere somewhat. Considering the circumstances, however, it went quite well. We had a good time reminiscing about our friendship and exchanged some what-happened-after stories. After exchanging phone numbers I drove him to the luxurious beach-front hotel where he was staying with his current family. ( How the fuck did he get to WholeFoods™? Did he walk? Did his au-pair somehow forgot him there? ) I went home in a funk. Suddenly my sagging gut, under-the-eyes-bags, thinning hair, perilous potency, seven marriages, grown-up children who never call, it all became hard to keep out of my mind. I felt cheated. Transgressed. Transgressing. Transgressive. Not because we had lost touch since that was my fault as much as his, perhaps mine much more. But for him not to grow up... What right does he have to remain as we were then?
There is an exact amount of thumb-sucking cycles, different for each person and depending on genetic and environmental factors, that must be performed in order to allow for the normal development of the brain, and therefore, of personality. The need and imperative for the attainment of this silver-bullet number of thumb-sucking cycles is the result of millions of years of evolution and should not be fucked with. When BLANK, BLANK and BLANK discovered this in 1973, they conjectured that the almost absolute majority of humans in the planet had had a 0.00000027% probability of having attained BLANK, as they termed it. They thought all these people were condemned to a life of personality retardation without any chance of improvement. The only solution, therefore, was to concentrate on the hopes of future generations. Due to the vast moral, ethical, cultural, social and political implications of their discovery and the necessity for revolutionary change on a global scale, they contacted the United Nations and held talks with its highest representatives, all the way to the Secretary General, then BLANK. Unfortunately they were mere persons of science and did not give a moment's reflection to the need for discretion. News about their discovery and their health proposals trickled up to the leaders of all major organizations. In a bizarre episode of ecumenical devilry members of the Catholic Church, the Ku Klux Klan, the Opus Dei Conclave ( an organization so secret and extreme that Dan Brown refrained from slandering them in his best-selling "The DaVinci Code" for fear of lethal reprisals, ) the Justin Tymberlake Fan Club International, three elderly ex-members of the Jewish Mafia in Brooklyn, the Society for the Prevention of Lemur Glaucoma,
José Jimenez, the Southern Baptist Conference, al-BLANK, ( al-BLANK's political arm, ) and BLANK Murdoch met in a diner at the corner of Geary and Murphy Streets in San Francisco, on 13 February 1974, Friday, at 11:22 pm, and there concocted a fiendish plan for the suppression of humanity's only hope for progress. Nine months later BLANK, BLANK and BLANK disappeared from the Campus of Barry University in SoFlo on the eve of a meeting about the renewal of their research grants from the NIH. That same morning, an unmarked van from the CDC ( Centers for Disease Control ) had a flat-tire near Davie, SoFlo. A rooster crowed three times before being fatally run over by a delivery truck in Peters Road, Plantation, SoFlo. Britney Spears woke up in tears from a nightmare where she suffered the same fate as Debbie Gibson only to find a purple pimple exactly on the top tangent of the left cheek of her behind. Neither the liberal nor the conservative media devoted any time or resources to the disappearance of the Barry Trio, as gossip-mongers had monickered the scientists. And then... nothing happened. Ever. Only thanks to a Mandelbrot set of coincidentally mysterious events is this information reaching your ears or eyeballs at this very moment. So here is what you should do: 1. Suck your thumb until an epiphany hits you. Do not do so in public, or course. Practice your cycles in the privacy of the can or in your trailer if you live alone or with a family permanently in an alcohol-induced comma. When the moment comes, you will experience a life-changing inner release and will be transformed into the person you were supposed to be. 2. Make sure that your genes are passed along to as many as possible. Of your numerous progeny, make sure the ones you raise are allowed to suck their thumb. What is a future orthodontia bill compared to peace and happiness for all mankind?
( If you use them I'll simply delete your empty balls off of here. ) I am also old enough to have kerned type for a living with a bloody x-acto knife but happily exchanged all the tools of that craft for digital ones, so know that I am no traditionalist fool. Prior to thus changing my working life for the immensurably better, I participated in the weird world of typesetting code. You may not know it but this is what HTML was really modeled after. One would sit in front of an obscenely expensive machine ( rented or granted by the hour ) and type formating commands ahead and after chunks of the actual text that would, when output, produce all manner of typographical sophistication. Which brings me to my point. Primitive and cumbersome as that was, it could produce sublime results under the right hands. ( And, of course, it beat sharp-object cut-and-paste by a world. It was progress even though nobody could afford it except the typesetting houses and many money-wasting corporate schlockos who used it to output the same courier-and-times-roman un-kerned shit they could do for a penny with an IBM Selectric. )
The world-wide web is a revolutionary development but the HTML that enabled it is actually a horrible step back. Right past the moment when personal computers ( those not running the evil OS ) had acquired the capacity for the refinement of typesetting code and more, without its labor and arcanity, along came HTML to badly impersonate it. It is no coincidence that the first generation of publications in htmlese were dead-ringers for the ugliest examples of courier-and-times-roman corporate documentia. ( In a related development, the U.S. Foreign Service recently announced that in order to get-with-it it is switching all diplomatic documents from Courier to... Times Roman! Those bolsheviks, what will they think of next? ) Microsoft is ( surprise ) partly to blame for this. Not UNIX, which already had things like Donald Knuth's TeX as well implemented ( for unixdom ) showcase standards. HTML instead was built for the most unsophisticated hack of the 20th century: Windows™. Yes it was, because it had to support all those PCs of crap commoditised machines that dominated the landscape. So we all got Velveeta™ instead of cheese because most of you did not know the difference between adult sex and pre-teen wanking, to put it gently. ( Here I will introduce a diversion to quote two of my best friends who said the ultimate truth about this side issue of good taste. First Dr. Greg Carter, psychology professor and master illustrator told me years ago in North Carolina: << Hector, no matter what you do, in the end, after all the effort, 90% of anything will always be schlock. >> Later, as a corollary, Mr. William Humm, pundit, curmudgeon and optical wizard added: << Yes, Hector, and when it comes out to 80% it is because 10% is masquerading as fashion. >> Depressing but impressive. ) Throughout history new developments in communication via the written word had always advanced ALL the state of the art. Güttenberg's process allowed for typographical finesse beyond what was possible before, ( with the obvious exception of illuminated texts. We still cannot match those. ) The "invention" of HTML may be the first time in history that progress arrived loaded with retrogress ( not in a non-related field, as is common with other examples of negative progress, but exactly in the same field it is supposed to improve. ) To help explain this odd happenstance we find the fundamental difference between the old innovators and these modern ones.
The former knew in intimate detail the art, process or method they were trying to replace or improve. The latter ( and this is rampant in the computer field where high-IQ-idiots constantly manage to automate the wrong thing ) are surprisingly ignorant and uneducated ( even after coming out of the best schools ) and believe their carelessly-acquired standards represent the best-of-class. And so we come back to our starting point: nice as they are, ( I use them both, ) Adobe GoLive™ and Macromedia Dreamweaver™ are sadly as comparable in power and sophistication to the original PageMaker 1.0 as fat-slob Microsoft Word™ is to Aldus Manutius' letterpress. They make HTML a little easier to live with but do not offer anything near as revolutionary as the PageMaker-MacPlus-LaserWriter trio did way back when. When is Adobe finally going to release their long-rumoured PostscriptPlayer plug-in for web browsers? When is the World Wide Web Consortium ( W3C ) finally going to release a standard that includes support for modern page description languages ( PDLs? ) When are we finally going to get something that will make us feel the thrill of liberation and empowerment we felt back in 1985...?
レビュー
レビュー
However, friends are much more precious than art or brilliant ideas. It was actually my own fault. Got too excited and moved too fast. Was not taken seriously because I am always joking and playing around with some reality versus fiction dilemma. Like the story of the little shepherd who cried wolf once too many times. But enough of that. The interesting thing is that it only took a few hours
for my mind to start formulating possible ways of fixing the problem. Many of which went well beyond the limits I have always counted on to keep me on this side of morality. I refused to consider those alternatives but the thoughts were really there, struggling to get a foothold somewhere and become reality. Secrecy and anonymity are highly corrosive substances. One should be very careful when handling them.
San Francisco to run along the waterfront, skirting the bottom of North Beach, going around Telegraph Hill, past the bit of the Financial District that sticks east and under the Bay Bridge into South Beach to finally turn around in front of the Ball Park and run back home to a very hot, 40-minute shower. Missed it so much that today's running could not satisfy. So back in SF it was the scenery I enjoyed, not the exercise. I suspected this but now know it to be true. Someday I may learn to love the exercise ( ...a deliberate split infinitive and what are you going do about it? ) and that sportsmanship may blot out the ultra sub-urban shopping-center wasteland that I find myself un-habiting in 2004. ( Yes, I also lack a strong appreciation of my good fortune. ) Meanwhile, yesterday was a more successful day.
1. Chicken salad from WholeFoods™. ( ...without which precious establishment I'd starve. I thank them. ) 2. Guinness™. It's good for you. << A Guinness™ is like a sheaf of wheat. >> Marcel Proust ( CAVEAT EMPTOR : it shall be permanently stored in your yet-to-be pot belly. ) 3. << Eats, Shoots & Leaves >> by Lynne Truss, ( her actual name. ) Hilarious. 4. Puffy, Led Zeppelin, BBC World Service, Radio Dismuke, Boredoms ( Pop Tatari, ) Yoshinori Sunahara, etcetera. 5. << In The Cut >> by Jane Campion, director's commentary. Interesting. 6. Worked a bit on my Secret Project. Entertaining. ( Thank Zeus I can still amuse myself. ) 7. To Vesselina Kasarova and Anonymous 4, as usual. And now << yeah, back to the old freezerinos. >> ( ...movie quote. )
for so many people to be prolifically ranting away in such a private-public manner, with the enhancement ( or detriment ) of images, sounds, typefaces, animations, links and the possibility ( not-so-great if one is not already well-provisioned with friends who will indulge one's excesses of expression ) of real responses from real people, ( if so, ) etcetera. Diaries are a lonely task, though that is their supposed advantage. Calling the Psy-chic Network or going to a real fake psy-chic surely are no better than the masturbatory satisfaction of self-published electronic pamphlets, broadsheets and leaflets. We are decidedly back to the era when one could sell doggerel in the street, with a vengeance and almost universal literacy, or what goes for it where you live. Blogging is amateur publishing that feels "real," ( the computer providing the realistic production values for little money or effort, ) but has a small likelihood of confronting a reading public who is not already friendly and well-disposed to the blogger. ) At least ( one imagines ) in the vast majority of cases. So, hoping not to libel anyone, including myself, here goes.































































